Navigating the Complex World of College Commuting: An Insightful Exploration
As we dive into another year of uncertainties surrounding FAFSA, the Free Application for Federal Student Aid, it becomes increasingly crucial to delve into the intricate financial landscape that many college students are grappling with today. Beyond the towering tuition fees, students are burdened with additional costs such as on-campus housing, meal plans, and indirect expenses that are not directly paid to their educational institution. Indirect costs encompass a myriad of essentials like textbooks, transportation, off-campus housing, and the ever-important computer. For students in California living off-campus, these indirect expenses can soar to approximately $21,000 annually, with even steeper costs for those living independently.
With a keen focus on financial implications, numerous students opt for commuting instead of residing on campus due to its cost-effectiveness, the convenience of living with family (which often involves caregiving responsibilities for parents, siblings, or children), or other home-related obligations. Surprisingly, statistics reveal that 60% of UC students, 86% of CSU students, and 85% of college students nationwide opt to commute to their respective campuses.
The ongoing 3E Study is diligently gathering economic, educational, and health-related data from students at public California State University (CSU) and University of California (UC) campuses to gain a comprehensive understanding over time. Participants were queried about their experiences during the previous academic year, shedding light on their most gratifying and disappointing encounters at their educational institutions.
Upon analyzing the data, a glaring trend surfaces: attending college is a costly endeavor, and commuter students are facing significant challenges. Many students recounted having to endure hour-long commutes each way to attend classes daily. The hurdles posed by their daily travel often hinder their academic and social growth during a pivotal phase in their personal development.
The voices of the participants vividly portray the harsh reality of college commuting:
“I anticipate being utterly drained as the day winds down. My commute (averaging 100 minutes one-way) has severely impacted my time management beyond my expectations, serving as the primary obstacle hindering my engagement on campus,” one student shares.
Other commuting peers expressed sentiments like “forming friendships has become considerably more challenging” and “juggling part-time work alongside a three-hour daily commute is a daunting task.”
The issue of commuting transcends affordability, exacerbating disparities in educational access. When low- and middle-income students encounter limited housing options on or near campus, struggle with numerous other expenses that deter them from contemplating on-campus residency, or bear the weight of caregiving responsibilities, their choices in terms of housing are significantly constrained, irrespective of the distance from campus.
Living at home while commuting to and from campus introduces a fresh set of financial strains. Many commuter students find it challenging to meet fuel costs. While residing at home may appear more economically viable than on-campus living, the expenses associated with refueling their vehicles every few days can be a financial burden.
One student, who travels from Los Angeles to Riverside (a distance of approximately 55 miles) for school, laments, “The constant financial hurdle I face is the lack of funds… gas has now become an absolute necessity for me to even consider pursuing higher education.”
To alleviate the financial strain of commuting, colleges should collaborate with local transit agencies to provide complimentary public transportation to all students—a program that several California colleges are already implementing. When determining financial aid disbursements, institutions should factor in commuting costs as part of the attendance expenses for non-residential students. Establishing specialized grant programs aimed at reducing tuition fees for commuter students allows them to allocate the saved funds towards covering gas expenses or vehicle payments.
Commuter students statewide are grappling with exorbitant tuition fees and soaring indirect costs. Effectively supporting the financial burdens associated with commuting is crucial for ensuring equal access to a fulfilling college experience.
Isabella Yalif, an undergraduate student in economics and sociology at Vanderbilt University, Lindsay Hoyt, an associate professor of applied developmental psychology at Fordham University, and Alison Cohen, an assistant professor of epidemiology and biostatistics at the University of California San Francisco, are the co-leads of the 3E study.
The viewpoints expressed in this commentary reflect those of the authors. EdSource welcomes diverse perspectives in commentaries. If you wish to submit a commentary, kindly review our guidelines and reach out to us.
