Miglani’s Experience with AI Tools
Miglani, a college student, finds AI tools like ChatGPT helpful for summarizing readings and making tasks easier. He uses these tools for homework assignments and checking math problems, although they struggle with complex equations. Initially, AI detection software wasn’t a concern, but with the rise of tools like Turnitin, Miglani now ensures his work isn’t flagged for AI use.
Joseph’s Minimalistic AI Use
Joseph uses AI sparingly, mainly for background information rather than completing assignments. She values the learning experience college offers and prefers not to rely heavily on AI tools, unlike some friends who use them for studying or quick answers.
Lim’s Reluctance Towards AI
Lim doesn’t heavily rely on AI tools, preferring to use Google for answers. While his roommates embrace AI, Lim feels college assignments don’t necessitate AI use for him personally, highlighting varying attitudes towards AI among students.
Moeckel’s Unease with AI
Moeckel admits to being apprehensive about AI, avoiding it due to concerns about its benefits and potential impact on learning. Despite his brothers using it, Moeckel believes AI can hinder genuine learning experiences, emphasizing the importance of understanding concepts independently.
Zhang’s Strategic AI Utilization
Zhang uses AI tools like ChatGPT and Claude for generating essay ideas and writing assignments. While some professors allow AI for research, most prohibit using it for citations or essays. Zhang ensures originality in his work to avoid plagiarism concerns, showcasing a balanced approach to AI use.
Lara’s Cautious AI Exploration
Lara has explored AI tools like ChatGPT for definitions and research purposes, respecting ethical boundaries and avoiding plagiarism. She believes AI can aid research but should be used responsibly with proper guidance and supervision.
Segoviano’s AI Avoidance
Segoviano refrains from AI use due to the fear of detection and plagiarism concerns, highlighting the impact of stringent anti-plagiarism measures on students’ AI utilization. Her cautious approach reflects the evolving academic landscape influenced by technology.
Licea’s Balanced AI Integration
Licea acknowledges AI’s role in generating ideas for assignments but emphasizes the importance of individual learning and creativity. She suggests professors incorporate AI tools responsibly to enhance learning rather than encourage direct copying, promoting a balanced approach to AI integration.
Robledo’s Limited AI Application
Robledo uses AI sparingly for specific tasks like resume writing, prioritizing authentic expression over AI assistance. She questions the benefits of heavy AI reliance for students, advocating for critical thinking and originality in assignments.
Aguilera’s Strategic AI Supplement
Aguilera leverages AI tools as study aids and accuracy checks, emphasizing efficient learning and understanding complex subjects. His thoughtful approach to AI use reflects a balance between technology integration and personal learning efforts.
Canale’s AI-Assisted Research
Canale uses AI to formulate research questions with professor approval, showcasing a positive example of responsible AI utilization for academic purposes. Her experience highlights the benefits of AI in guiding scholarly inquiries.
Velasco Polanco’s AI Study Guide
Velasco Polanco utilizes AI as a study tool to enhance learning efficiency and information retention, showcasing AI’s potential in facilitating educational processes. Her strategic use of AI reflects a proactive approach to academic success.
Rangel’s Varied AI Experience
Rangel’s diverse experience with AI tools across different subjects underscores the nuanced impact of AI on learning outcomes. His observations on AI’s effectiveness in humanities versus STEM fields highlight the need for tailored AI strategies in academic settings.
Salas’s Observations on AI Usage
Salas shares insights into peers’ AI usage for specific subjects, emphasizing the practical application of AI in problem-solving scenarios. Her observations shed light on varying attitudes towards AI among students and faculty members.
Esevez’s Perspective on AI Approval
Esevez highlights the importance of faculty approval when utilizing AI tools for assignments, emphasizing ethical considerations and academic integrity. Her stance reflects a conscientious approach to AI usage in educational settings.
Torres’s Insights on Faculty Perception
Torres discusses faculty attitudes towards AI usage, indicating a general skepticism among teachers regarding AI’s role in student assignments. His observations underscore the need for open dialogue and clear guidelines on AI integration in academia.
Games’s AI Application in Education
Games shares experiences of using AI for understanding complex subjects and obtaining sources, illustrating the multifaceted role of AI tools in educational contexts. His insights reflect the diverse approaches students take towards AI utilization in their academic journey.